Contracts - Consideration, Terms, and Breach Flash Cards

 
log in to manage your card piles
front back revisions lasted changed by history
Two types of satisfaction clauses
1) Commercial value, operative fitness, mechanical utility (reasonable person- objective)
2) Fancy, taste, judgment (Good faith-subjective)
Mattei 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:26:31 GMT view revision history
If the place of delivery is left uncertain then operation of law determines (business, residence, some reasonable place) UCC §2-308 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:26:31 GMT view revision history
Parties can conclude a K without stating the price and a reasonable price is attributed if:
1) Nothing is stated as to the price or
2) The price is left to be agreed by the parties and they fail to agree or
3) The price is to be fixed by the market or some other standard
UCC §2-305(1) 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:26:31 GMT view revision history
Missing terms can be added as long as there is a reasonable basis for filling in the terms UCC §2-204(3) 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:24:19 GMT view revision history
The court will interpret the K as the parties intended at the time of K formation Moolenaar 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:24:19 GMT view revision history
If a methodology for determining a term is present then the actual term does not need to be present Deli 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:24:19 GMT view revision history
Agreeing to agree is not an agreement (enforceable) Deli 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:24:19 GMT view revision history
New terms that do not add material obligations and should have been reasonably expected do not invalidate the K if added after O and A Crook 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:23:29 GMT view revision history
It is not necessary for a K to contain every possible contractual provision (Berg Agency)
The court can look to industry custom to fill gaps
Saliba-Kringlen Corp 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:23:29 GMT view revision history
The presence of a satisfaction clause does not make a K indefinite b/c a party cannot claim dissatisfaction in bad faith Academy Chicago Publishers 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:23:29 GMT view revision history
A K is still certain even if some terms are left up to one of the parties RSC §34(1) 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:23:29 GMT view revision history
A K can be enforced even though some terms may be left to be agreed upon unless there is not bases for the court to decide if the agreement has been kept or broken RSC §33 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:22:39 GMT view revision history
A K is reasonably definite if the court can ascertain what the parties have agreed to do Academy Chicago Publishers 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:22:39 GMT view revision history
Courts will look to the context of the situation to determine intent of contracting parties and interpretation of terms Lawson 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:22:39 GMT view revision history
Lady Duff Gordon rule for goods UCC §2-306(2) 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:22:39 GMT view revision history
Party must make “reasonable effort” to fulfill terms of K Lady Duff Gordon 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:20:31 GMT view revision history
Requirements K
Can’t demand unreasonably high or low amount
UCC §2-306(1) 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:19:59 GMT view revision history
Promise enforceable even if no preexisting obligation if promisor receives material benefit Webb 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:19:59 GMT view revision history
Promising to pay a debt incurred while a minor Webb 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:19:59 GMT view revision history
Promising to pay a debt discharged by statute of limitations – this promise can be established by simply acknowledging existence of the debt, saying that you will waive SoL or giving any sum of money (b/c it resurrects the entire debt) Webb 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:19:59 GMT view revision history
a check for accord
1) Bona fide excuse
2) Check sent as good faith effort to settle dispute
3) Conspicuous statement that the check is for an accord
UCC §3-311(b) 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:18:55 GMT view revision history
No accord for undisputed pre-existing debt Foakes 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:18:55 GMT view revision history
A waived condition can be reinstated by the party who waived it if
There is notice of reinstatement within reasonable time to cause condition to occur or an extension is given
Reinstatement of condition is not unjust because of material change of position by the beneficiary
RSC §84 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:18:55 GMT view revision history
Waiver must be explicit (basically the other party must know) Clark - publisher put in the K that he must abstain from alcohol. Clark argued that the condition was waived when he told them he had been drinking and they didn't care 1 Andrewcm09 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:25:54 GMT view revision history
A condition cannot be waived if it is material to the K Clark - publisher, sobriety, waiver of condition, casebook 1 Andrewcm09 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:27:15 GMT view revision history
Condition can only be waived by the party benefitting from the condition Clark - publisher, casebook, alcohol, sobriety, waiver of condition 1 Andrewcm09 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:38:13 GMT view revision history
New C cannot be nominal in modification K Angel 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:16:47 GMT view revision history
Test to see if new K is enforceable without new C
1) The K is executory
2) Mod was not involuntary or agreed to under duress
3) Underlying circumstances relating modification are unanticipated
4) Fair and Equitable
RSC §89 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:16:47 GMT view revision history
Modification of a K is a K Angel 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:15:05 GMT view revision history
presence of a satisfaction clause does not negate consideration because party is still bound Mattei 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:15:05 GMT view revision history
satisfaction clause is not consideration because by itself it is not consideration (no bargain) Mattei 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:15:04 GMT view revision history
restricted right to terminate is consideration Gurfein 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:15:04 GMT view revision history
unrestricted right to terminate = no consideration no K Gurfein 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:14:19 GMT view revision history
A K of sale is mutual if there is an agreement to sell on one side and buy on another. If only one exists then it is not mutual Wickham 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:14:19 GMT view revision history
A K cannot have C if it lacks mutuality Wickham 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:14:19 GMT view revision history
A valid K may be conditioned upon the happening of an event, even though the event may depend upon the will of the party Scott 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:14:18 GMT view revision history
Either both sides are bound or neither is bound Wickham 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:13:29 GMT view revision history
Partial payment of preexisting debt is not enforceable because of preexisting duty Foakes 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:13:29 GMT view revision history
Promise to perform pre-existing duty is not C Lingenfelder 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:13:29 GMT view revision history
Performance of existing duty is not C Slattery 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:13:29 GMT view revision history
Nominal consideration is consideration in an options contract Dickinson 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:12:37 GMT view revision history
If a K gives a party choice of consideration it is valid if each choice is consideration RSC §77 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:12:37 GMT view revision history
False recital of C does not negate C Batsakis 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:12:37 GMT view revision history
Foregoing non-frivolous litigation is C (settling) Schnell 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:12:37 GMT view revision history
Foregoing frivolous litigation is not C Schnell 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:56 GMT view revision history
Past C is not C Schnell 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:56 GMT view revision history
Benefit not necessary for consideration Hamer 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:56 GMT view revision history
Nominal C is not C Schnell 1 Andrewcm09 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:28:41 GMT view revision history
C is based on legal detriment not benefit Hamer 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:15 GMT view revision history
Non-C does not negate C Hamer - "don't do drugs" not consideration because no legal right to do it in the first place 1 Andrewcm09 Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:18:01 GMT view revision history
C is giving up a legal right/freedom Hamer 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:15 GMT view revision history
Promise to give a gift is not enforceable Dougherty 0 Andrewcm09 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:11:15 GMT view revision history

Study Now
View Users (1)